Review-Request: Fix of JDK-8034775 neglects to account for non-JIT VMs

Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf at
Tue Apr 29 11:34:01 UTC 2014

On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 13:09 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> As to why the if on line 167 is entered I'm still unsure. Apparently one
> of COMPILER1, COMPILER2, SHARK is defined for a --with-jvm-variants=zero
> build. It's not apparent to me which it is and why :-/

Well scratch that. It appears I've not had enough coffee today. Sorry
for the noise.


More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list