RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model
volker.simonis at gmail.com
Thu Mar 27 08:36:28 UTC 2014
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com> wrote:
> There are unfortunately legal complications surrounding updating these
> files. We can initiate the approval dance, but it will take time to go
> through (weeks at least). This is the reason Magnus added the wrapper around
> config.guess, so that we could get functional updates to it faster.
OK, but as I wrote, config.guess currently only maps some recognized
systems to different names. This case is different because for ppc64le
the output of 'autoconf-config.guess' would be an emtpy string and a
quite big error message on stderr. Do you really want that we make
Linux/ppc64le the default fallback in config.guess if
'autoconf-config.guess' can not detect a system?
Or should we exceptionally just patch 'autoconf-config.guess' if we
know that we will update it anyway with a new version within a few
weeks? I think I'd prefer this solution, because this is just one
change which will be automatically removed once we integrate the new
'autoconf-config.guess' version. If we just hack 'config.guess' we
would have to manually take that change back once we get the new
In any case I'd kindly ask you to start the 'legal approval dance' :)
> I agree that long term, updating these files from the source is the correct
> On 2014-03-26 23:47, Alexander Smundak wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Volker Simonis
>> <volker.simonis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So I'd suggest we just check in this new version for the current
>> I agree.
>> Magnus, would you like me to do this?
More information about the hotspot-dev