[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: AARCH64: 8064594: Top-level JDK changes

Dean Long dean.long at oracle.com
Mon Feb 2 00:07:53 UTC 2015

On 2/1/2015 4:00 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 1/02/2015 7:56 AM, Dean Long wrote:
>> On 1/30/2015 12:48 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>>> On 30/01/15 08:31, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> On 30/01/15 07:06, Dean Long wrote:
>>>>> Sorry for the late question, but how is
>>>>> src/java.base/unix/native/libjli/aarch64/jvm.cfg different from
>>>>> src/java.base/unix/conf/aarch64/jvm.cfg?  I can't find where the 
>>>>> former
>>>>> is used.
>>>> I'm sorry, I have no idea!  I can investigate next week when I
>>>> get back from FOSDEM.
>>> It looks like that has been copied there by mistake. There is no such
>>> file in the aarch64-port jdk9 tree from which stage was derived nor is
>>> there one in the arch64-port jdk8 tree.
>>> regards,
>>> Andrew Dinn
>>> -----------
>> I filed a bug:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072053
> Shouldn't this just be fixed as part of the push of the current bug? 
> Separate bugs are only needed for things that will need to be fixed 
> after the merge with mainline.

8064594 has already been pushed to the staging repo, so I don't see how 
we can fix it in the staging repo without a new bugid.
And while it would be nice to get it fixed before it goes into mainline, 
I don't want it to cause any delay in the merge with the


> David
>> dl

More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list