RFR: 8073093: AARCH64: C2 generates poor code for ByteBuffer accesses
fweimer at redhat.com
Tue Feb 17 10:15:27 UTC 2015
On 02/17/2015 11:00 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 09:39 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 02/14/2015 01:09 AM, John Rose wrote:
>>> These queries need to go into Unsafe.
>>> We also need Unsafe.getIntMisaligned, etc., which wire through to whatever second-best mechanism the platform offers.
>> The safe variants should go into the java.lang.Integer etc. classes
>> IMHO. Even the JDK has quite a few uses for them (particularly the
>> big endian variant). Putting that into Unsafe only encourages
>> further use of Unsafe from application code.
> They'll all be visible as ByteBuffer methods, which should be enough
> for application code, shouldn't it? I'm not sure how much sense it
> makes to put them into java.lang.Integer etc.
You'll still have to allocate a wrapping ByteBuffer object to use them.
I expect that makes them unattractive in many cases.
Hmm, maybe I should propose a patch for DataInputStream and see how it's
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
More information about the hotspot-dev