JEP 248: Make G1 the Default Garbage Collector

Ben Evans benjamin.john.evans at
Fri Jun 5 09:48:09 UTC 2015

Hi Mark & Charlie,

Thanks for the summary.

I'm cautiously optimistic about the plan - but I would like a bit more
of an idea of what quantitative data & experiences we would need to
prove whether G1 was ready or not.

I've conducted a survey of apps via the user groups & should have some
data on how many apps run with default collectors later on today.



On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:08 PM,  <mark.reinhold at> wrote:
> 2015/6/4 6:44 -0700, charlie.hunt at
>> Wanted to come back to this thread, continue the dialog, reiterate the
>> objective, (try to) summarize the concerns and put forth a potential
>> plan for this JEP going forward.
>> Intent: Use G1 GC as the default collector chosen by the JVM when no
>> GC is explicitly set at the JVM command line.
>> ...
> Charlie -- thanks for the excellent summary of this wide-ranging
> discussion!
>> ...
>> Suggested plan for moving forward:
>> - Make G1 the default collector in JDK 9, continue to evaluate G1 and
>>   enhance G1 in JDK 9
>> - Mitigate risk by reverting back to Parallel GC before JDK 9 goes
>>   “Generally Available” (Sept 22, 2016 [1]) if warranted by continuing
>>   to monitor observations and experiences with G1 in both JDK 9
>>   pre-releases and latest JDK 8 update releases
>> - Address enhancing ergonomics for selecting a default GC as a
>>   separate JEP if future observations suggests its needed
> I think this is a fine plan.
> Stefan -- To move forward with JEP 248, could you please revise the
> second item in the "Risks and Assumptions" section to note that there
> is some concern that G1 might not be ready to become the default, that
> making it the default now will allow us to get more feedback on it, and
> that if it proves to be not ready then we'll revert the default to the
> Parallel GC in time for JDK 9 GA?
> Ben -- Can you live with this plan?
> - Mark

More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list