RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration)
claes.redestad at oracle.com
Tue Jun 9 13:26:27 UTC 2015
On 2015-06-09 15:12, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> old L171: case "1.9":
>> new L171: case "9":
>> Should this logic support both versions? Will dropping
>> "1.9" here prevent a pre-version changeset JVM from
>> being dropped into a JDK for triage purposes?
>> Granted we don't often triage 'javac' with different JVMs,
> I'll defer that question to Kumar, who wrote that piece of code. My
> guess is that when Hotspot express was dropped, the ability to use a
> JVM from another JDK release bit rotteded away.
While we know there's no guarantee that swapping in an older VM will
work, in the face of a regression in a promoted build we still routinely
(automatically, even) swap out the VM with a recent VM to get a rough
estimate of whether the regression was caused by a HotSpot or JDK/tools
change, mostly since this currently saves us time in narrowing down the
changes to bisect over/investigate. So, there's at least some value in
not intentionally breaking build-to-build backwards compatibility, but
we don't expect it to always work and wouldn't make much fuss about it
breaking. If an extra case "1.9" is all it takes to make it work with
last week's VM, however...
More information about the hotspot-dev