RFR (S): JDK-8142909 Integration of minor fixes from the build-infra project
david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon Nov 16 02:10:24 UTC 2015
On 13/11/2015 9:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> On 2015-11-13 09:13, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Perhaps the order of "$(OPT_CFLAGS/NOOPT) $(OPT_CFLAGS/$(BUILDARCH))"
>> should be reversed to guarantee that NOOPT is the one used in case
>> BUILDARCH contains something that conflicts? The solaris file does it
>> this way.
> You know you wrote that code originally? ;-)
> Yeah, I agree, it's more reasonable. Updated webrev:
I don't like this particular change as it is too generic. It gives the
appearance of being apply to apply whatever the BUILDARCH specific
optflags are, which makes no sense if the whole point here is to not
optimize these files. If all this is intended to do is include -g then I
think that should be done explicitly.
! # Order src files alfabetically
That would be "alphabetically". But that list doesn't seem alphabetic
anyway: MacosxDebuggerLocal.m would come after libproc_impl.c; and
$(AGENTDIR) should come first. I really see no point in forcing such
lists to be in alphabetic order.
make/linux/makefiles/saproc.make doesn't have the comment that was added
Similar issue with bsd amd64.make. Not sure what you are trying to
achieve here - is it some kind of last option wins situation ?
Harmless I guess but not sure about relevance of sort order here.
So that's where that comes from! :)
I don't see anything in the cpp files that uses anything from the atomic
>> Otherwise looks good.
>> On 2015-11-13 03:34, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> In the new hotspot build project, we have made a few changes to the
>>> existing build. In preparation for the new build, I'd like to
>>> integrate these into mainline.
>>> These changes are:
>>> * When overriding optimization, do not lose current debug (-g)
>>> setting (!)
>>> * Make adlc actually quiet in quiet mode
>>> * Make g1EvacStats.cpp compile in all cases without precompiled headers
>>> * Sort saproc object files when linking (facilitates comparison to
>>> new build)
>>> Unless someone suggests otherwise, I intend to push this (using JPRT)
>>> to hs-rt.
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8142909
More information about the hotspot-dev