RFR: 8186476: Generalize Atomic::add with templates
aph at redhat.com
Fri Aug 25 16:23:13 UTC 2017
On 25/08/17 16:28, Erik Österlund wrote:
> In that case, I see no current objections to the solution Kim handed off
> to me. Are we good to go?
Yes. I'd rather not do it that way, but instead make the field a
32-bit integer type and unpack it as required, but I totally
understand that it would be inconvenient for users of Symbol.
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the hotspot-dev