RFR(XS) [8u backport] 8181055: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813

Andrew Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Tue Jul 18 13:31:59 UTC 2017

On 17 July 2017 at 19:16, Zhengyu Gu <zgu at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> This 8u backport of JDK-8181005 has been reviewed by Aleksey [1] and
> approved by Rob [2].
> However, it is not clear to me that the only reviewer has to be 'R'eviewer.
> If so, can someone with 'R' to review the backport? It is almost the same as
> JDK9, with very minor conflicts.
> I will also need sponsor this backport.
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181055
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8181055/8u/webrev.00/
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-June/027104.html
> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-June/006723.html
> Thanks,
> -Zhengyu

It looks good to me. The 8u patch matches what we included in our packages
and matches the patch already in hs/10, bar a slight context difference in one
case. It built fine.

I'm an 8u reviewer if that's what you're looking for.

I can push it too if needed (I've pushed 8u jdk patches before), but
not sure if 8u
HotSpot patches still need to be run through that JPRT thing. Some clarity on
this would be good.

Is there a plan to fix this in 9 as well?

Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list