RFR: 8200232: Build failures after JDK-8200106 (Move NoSafepointVerifier out from gcLocker.hpp)
thomas.stuefe at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 19:13:01 UTC 2018
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/26/2018 08:29 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com
> <mailto:shade at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > On 03/26/2018 02:48 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 12:36 +0200, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > >> Bug:
> > >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200232 <
> > >>
> > >> Webrev:
> > >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8200232/webrev.01/
> > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eshade/8200232/webrev.01/>
> > >>
> > >> Testing: x86_32 build
> > >>
> > >> I only saw failures on x86_32, but maybe PPC folks see the
> > >> in other configs too?
> > >
> > > looks good, but maybe wait for the ppc folks to comment too.
> > Yup.
> > Paging Martin Doerr? Mr. Doerr to the build clinic.
> > Well, he can't, he is is out sick himself :(
> > I just tested AIX, linux ppc64 and s390, all build fine (had unrelated
> build errors on AIX, but that
> > was the jdk, libjvm was successfully built). Note that we do not build
> ppc 32bit. I also did not
> > test non-pch builds.
> Yeah, I wanted to see if Windows/32 and PPC/32 are affected too. Martin
> had fixed build issues there
> before, as these seem to be built by SAP routinely. I can wait a day for
> someone to look into CI and
> give a clear-go. If that does not happen, I'll push the x86_32 fix at
We do not build windows 32bit anymore, at least not for openjdk11. That was
Martins private thing over the last weeks.
We never did build ppc32 bit to my knowledge - this should be zero only,
no? Might be worth checking with Adrian, he builds zero regularly.
Anyway, I had a quick look through the sources and it seems you should fix
os_solaris_x86.cpp and os_bsd_x86.cpp too, same error there. All the other
os_xx_xx.cpp seem fine to me.
More information about the hotspot-dev