RFR (S) 8211926: Catastrophic size_t underflow in BitMap::*_large methods
shade at redhat.com
Fri Nov 9 09:33:49 UTC 2018
On 11/09/2018 02:36 AM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> I believe new patch is as straightforward as it could be, see:
> I was about ready to approve, but took another look at the new test.
> Unfortunately, I think it has some problems.
Okay, let's try again after fixing the problems you mentioned:
Moved STATIC_ASSERT and comments to the actual use site, rewritten test. Test takes 0.5s per TEST().
Looks good now?
More information about the hotspot-dev