RFR 8233272 : The Class.forName specification should be updated to match the long-standing implementation with respect to class linking
brent.christian at oracle.com
Fri Nov 15 00:33:51 UTC 2019
On 11/14/19 4:12 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 15/11/2019 9:58 am, Brent Christian wrote:
> Test is fine. Just one note/clarification:
> 63 // Loading (but not linking) Container will succeed.
> Container was already loaded as part of the failing forName call, so
> this second forName will just return it.
Hmm. I could use a different classloader instance for the second
(The test does fail as expected using a build with 8212117 but without
More information about the hotspot-dev