RFR: 8062536: [TESTBUG] Conflicting GC combinations in jdk tests

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Nov 6 10:13:23 UTC 2014


On 6/11/2014 8:05 PM, Evgeniya Stepanova wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> tag added because tests contain string
>   cmd.addAll(JpsHelper.getVmArgs());
>
> and JpsHelper defines
> ...
> public static final String[] VM_ARGS = {"-Xmx512m", "-XX:+UseParallelGC"};

Ah I see! Strange.

Thanks for clarifying.

Looks okay then.

David
-----

> ...
> public static List<String> getVmArgs() throws IOException {
>          if (testVmArgs == null) {
>              testVmArgs = new ArrayList<>();
>              testVmArgs.addAll(Arrays.asList(VM_ARGS));
>              testVmArgs.add("-XX:Flags=" +
> getVmFlagsFile().getAbsolutePath());
>          }
>          return testVmArgs;
>      }
>
> Tests itself wouldn't fail if we use another GC, tag added for
> cleanup-if we use for example SerialGC we must be sure that tests passed
> with this GC, not with another one. Now you will assume that concrete
> test passed with Serial GC, but it run only with Parallel GC. Plus there
> is no any sense to run test twice in TC (with different GC, since it use
> only Parallel)
>
> Thanks,
> Evgeniya Stepanova
> On 06.11.2014 6:20, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Evgeniya,
>>
>> On 6/11/2014 1:33 AM, Evgeniya Stepanova wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review changes for 8062536, the OpenJDK/jdk part of the
>>> JDK-8019361
>>>
>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062536
>>> fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~eistepan/8062536/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Problem: Some tests explicitly set GC and fail when another GC is set
>>> outside
>>
>> I don't see why you have done this for the
>>
>> test/sun/tools/jps/TestJps*.java
>>
>> tests. They don't set any GC flags.
>>
>>> Solution: Such tests marked with the jtreg tag "requires" to skip test
>>> if there is a conflict
>>
>> Just wondering: Does a skipped test get a .jtr file showing it was
>> skipped; or does it only appear in the higher-level jtreg log?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>>> Tested locally with different GC flags (-XX:+UseG1GC,
>>> -XX:+UseParallelGC, -XX:+UseSerialGC, -XX:+UseConcMarkSweep and without
>>> any GC flag). Tests are being excluded as expected. No tests failed
>>> because of the conflict.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Evgeniya Stepanova
>>>
>>> //
>
> --
> /Evgeniya Stepanova/


More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list