RFR (S) 8078438: Interpreter should support conditional card marks (UseCondCardMark)

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Wed Apr 29 09:40:56 UTC 2015


On 04/29/2015 09:27 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> But for non-volatile stores the accompanying StoreCM needs to be
> translated to stlrb. We need that to enforce completion of the preceding
> stlr<x> before the card mark becomes visible. So, the status quo is
> still inadequate.

I'm on it.

Andrew.



More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list