RFR (XL): JDK-8086706 Parallel Full GC for CMS
jeremymanson at google.com
Mon Aug 3 22:20:48 UTC 2015
What's the matter with the JEP that Jungwoo sent?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
> We'd certainly like to see a JEP for this. There are use cases where CMS
> is the right collector and this proposed patch could (I'll stress could)
> significantly improve its performance.
> On 3 August 2015 at 19:53, Jon Masamitsu <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com> wrote:
>> As you can see no one has stepped up to do your review.
>> We’ve talked about it amongst the active GC committers.
>> It’s a large change and would require a very significant
>> commitment of anyone’s time. As is obvious, our focus
>> is on G1. And right now we’re in the position of having to
>> push tasks we’ve long planned for JDK 9 out into a JDK 9
>> update. No one I’ve talked with is willing to push off more
>> of our G1 work to get this patch in. And as maintainers
>> of the HotSpot GC's due diligence is required of us before
>> we can accept this change.
>> PS. I saw that you said you had started another thread for this
>> discussion (or maybe the discussion of the JEP) but I could not
>> it. Please feel free to repost this under the new subject.
>> On 06/27/2015 05:48 PM, Jungwoo Ha wrote:
>> Sorry for the long wait. So many things have cleaned up on JDK9.
>> Here is the webrev against jdk9/hs-rt.
>> I am preparing for the JEP doc.
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Kim Barrett <kim.barrett at oracle.com>
>>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>
>>> > Hi,
>>> > if nobody has already started doing it, I'll try to forward port the
>>> > patch to jdk9/hs-gc/hotspot.
>>> You’ll want to use jdk9/hs-rt rather than jdk9/hs-gc.
>> Jungwoo Ha | Java Platform Team | jwha at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev