RFR (XXS): 8133043: Clean up code related to termination stats printing

Jon Masamitsu jon.masamitsu at oracle.com
Wed Aug 5 15:52:02 UTC 2015


You substituted _queue_num for i (worker_id) in


-               i, elapsed_ms, s_roots_ms, s_roots_ms * 100 / elapsed_ms,
+               _queue_num, elapsed_ms, s_roots_ms, s_roots_ms * 100 / elapsed_ms,

I can see how _queue_num would be more interesting  but is worker_id just
of no value so it is not worth printing?   I don't have any perspective 
on this
so I'm not objecting to dropping the worker_id.    Just wondering if 
less is better.  And you can push it as is.

Rest looks good.



On 8/5/2015 4:59 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi all,
>    can I have some reviews for the following change that cleans up and
> reformats the code and usage related to G1 termination stats?
> Stuff like not using braces around if-clauses, dropping an extra
> temporary lock, linebreaks in string constants, line breaks in the
> definition of the methods, superfluous additional parameters.
> I generally do not do reformatting changes, but every time I browse
> through that code it gives me an urge to fix that.
> CR:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133043
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8133043/webrev/
> Testing:
> compilation, gcbasher run with -XX:+PrintTerminationStats, jprt
> Thanks,
>    Thomas

More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list