RFR (XXS): 8072688: Description of flag ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent should mantion G1 as well [Was: Re: comments in globals.hpp]

Kirk Pepperdine kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 15:32:04 UTC 2015


seems reasonable!

Regards,
Kirk

On Feb 9, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Mikael Gerdin <mikael.gerdin at oracle.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2015-02-09 16:17, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
>> Mikael Gerdin skrev den 9/2/15 16:08:
>>> On 2015-02-09 16:01, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>>>> Hi Jesper,
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 15:30 +0100, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote:
>>>>> Hi Kirk,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for reporting this!
>>>>> I filed a bug:
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072688
>>>>> 
>>>>> and have a fix out for review:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jwilhelm/8072688/webrev.00/
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   looks good - not sure if the explicit mention of the two
>>>> collectors is
>>>> necessary. We do not do it for many other flags either.
>>> 
>>> I agree that it would be better to not mention any specific GC:
>>> "effective only when a concurrent GC is enabled"
>>> is my suggestion.
>>> 
>> 
>> Since I already changed it to "(effective only when using concurrent
>> collectors)" and published the new webrev, that is my suggestion :)
>> 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jwilhelm/8072688/webrev.01/
> 
> That's fine with me.
> 
> /Mikael
> 
>> 
>> /Jesper
>> 
>>> /Mikael
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe if you waited a little more if somebody else feels strongly about
>>>> this.
>>>> 
>>>> You do not need to hide the review request too :)
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>   Thomas
>>>> 
>>>> 



More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list