JEP 291: Deprecate the Concurrent Mark Sweep (CMS) Garbage Collector

Jeremy Manson jeremymanson at google.com
Thu Jul 21 16:46:12 UTC 2016


I was drafting an agenda.  My expectation is that the meeting will go
something like this:

Introductions

Discussion of motivations for JEP 291 (Jon M)

Discussions of concerns about JEP 291 (roundtable)

Discussion / Brainstorming about potential ways forward, as well as an
understanding of what level of commitment organizations are willing to make.

Discussion of action items and followup.

Jeremy


On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> For me it's to see if there are enough folks who are willing *and* capable
> (to be blunt, it will need the backing of large companies) of maintaining
> CMS as a collector going forwards (it's important to several of our
> customers).  If that's a yes then I'd hope to have a technical discussion
> around the options of how we could achieve that without causing a major
> headache for the Oracle GC engineers.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 20 July 2016 at 23:50, Jon Masamitsu <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> What are peoples expectations for this meeting?
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On 07/18/2016 10:16 AM, Jeremy Manson wrote:
>>
>> Presumably, everyone will be happy with meeting notes rather than an
>> actual recording.
>>
>> Otherwise, I'll add:
>>
>> ysr1729 at gmail.com
>> mark.reinhold at oracle.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:13 AM, <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com>
>> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ok we can record if everyone is open to that.
>>>
>>> On Jul 18, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Jeremy Manson <jeremymanson at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard - I'll bring someone who can take readable notes. :)
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:07 AM, <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com>
>>> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com < <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com>
>>> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>
>>>> I think it’s in everyone’s interest to keep this out in the open.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Kirk
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 16, 2016, at 1:34 AM, Richard Warburton <
>>>> <richard.warburton at gmail.com>richard.warburton at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Sounds as if the consensus is a telephone / video conference in the
>>>>> near term, and then a F2F during / close to JavaOne.
>>>>>
>>>>> People who want to be invited include:
>>>>>
>>>>> <kirk at kodewerk.com>kirk at kodewerk.com
>>>>> <aph at redhat.com>aph at redhat.com
>>>>> <volker.simonis at gmail.com>volker.simonis at gmail.com
>>>>> <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com>jon.masamitsu at oracle.com
>>>>> <jeremymanson at google.com>jeremymanson at google.com
>>>>> <martijnverburg at gmail.com>martijnverburg at gmail.com
>>>>> <jwha at google.com>jwha at google.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Did I miss anyone?  We can take date / time planning and logistics
>>>>> off-list.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Given that this change affects a lot of organisations and people in the
>>>> wider Java community I think it would be really appreciated that a brief
>>>> summary of the discussion be published somewhere in public. Maybe this
>>>> mailing list?
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>>   Richard Warburton
>>>>
>>>>   <http://insightfullogic.com/>http://insightfullogic.com
>>>>   @RichardWarburto <http://twitter.com/richardwarburto>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20160721/16b80686/attachment.html>


More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list