RFR(s): 8145312: CMS: There is insufficient memory with CMSSamplingGrain=1
sangheon.kim at oracle.com
Tue Mar 8 21:40:03 UTC 2016
I'm okay with including the flag.
Do you mean valid additional big values will be excluded as well?
I guess max_jint+1 and max_juint+1, right?
I excluded it as it will always fail with its max value and it also
tries allocation which would make the testing time longer.
On 03/08/2016 12:26 PM, Dmitry Dmitriev wrote:
> Hi Sangheon,
> Please, don't exclude testing of max range for CMSSamplingGrain flag,
> because in this case additional big values will be excluded too. Max
> value for CMSSamplingGrain will violates constraint, but it's ok for
> Thank you,
> On 08.03.2016 11:00, sangheon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Could I have some reviews for CMSSamplingGrain flag?
>> The flag is used to calculate points at which the young gen should be
>> partitioned for doing parallel work, so it only makes sense to
>> partition at a granularity equal to or larger than the object size.
>> I am proposing to change the minimum value of CMSSamplingGrain from
>> '1' to 'ObjectAlignmentInBytes'. (ObjectAlignmentInBytes has a range
>> of [8, 256]).
>> In addition, I added a constraint function to avoid an arithmetic
>> overflow by its maximum value.
>> CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145312
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sangheki/8145312/webrev.00/
>> Testing: JPRT, RBT for all platforms including embedded
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev