RFR(S): 8165489: Missing G1 barrier in Unsafe_GetObjectVolatile

Kim Barrett kim.barrett at oracle.com
Thu Sep 15 16:13:59 UTC 2016


> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Doerr, Martin <martin.doerr at sap.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kim and Mikael,
> 
> here's how it looks like according to the current state of the discussion:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8165489_G1_Unsafe/webrev.02/
> 
> Thanks for your input. I think it looks good this way.
> 
> If I'm not missing anything, the only open question is if v should be put into a handle which gets passed to ensure_satb_referent_alive. IMHO it looks better as it is now, but if you come to the conclusion that the handle is desired, I'll provide an update.

This looks good.



More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list