RFR (XS): 8165860: workgroup classes are missing volatile qualifiers for lock-free code

Thomas Schatzl thomas.schatzl at oracle.com
Mon Sep 19 15:00:36 UTC 2016


Hi,

On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 15:50 +0200, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> 
> On 2016-09-19 15:48, Erik Österlund wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Mikael Gerdin noticed a compiler workaround could be done in a
> > nicer-looking way.

  so just assigning the volatile to the temp is not sufficient to make
sure the compiler generates code to only read it once?

Thanks,
  Thomas



More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list