10 RFR: 8169517: WhiteBox should provide concurrent GC phase control
shade at redhat.com
Mon Mar 6 09:56:41 UTC 2017
On 03/05/2017 02:01 AM, Kim Barrett wrote:
> For the tests I've written so far or know I'll be writing, the effort
> involved in creating and maintaining that sort of sanity check seems not even
> remotely worth the trouble.
Having developed GC tests _and_ having used stringy APIs, I wholeheartedly
disagree. An API that accepts strings, but has no "list" method to enumerate
expected strings is bad API.
> I would rather not add code that I think has a good chance of never being
> used. It can be added later if someone really wants it.
All right, fine, push it like this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev