RFR: 8191564: Refactor GC related servicability code into GC specific subclasses
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Thu Nov 30 18:41:58 UTC 2017
On 11/30/17 10:26 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Hi Mandy,
> thanks for reviewing! I think Erik Ö. already pushed it for me.
>> A minor comment that GCMemoryManager could take an enum to indicate
>> the type of this GC action (major vs minor). This can be a future
> This may be overly restrictive: some GCs may not necessarily provide a
> major/minor distinction, but have only one GC manager (e.g. epsilon),
> or may provide 3 or more GC managers (e.g. 'minor' partial (or young)
> GC, 'intermediate' concurrent GC, 'intermediate or major' concurrent
> full GC, 'major' STW last-ditch full GC...).
Right - there will be more than 2 enums and major and major are just
examples that could let GC notififer to determine the message based on
the type. This is minor and just a thought that can be considered in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev