Storing both "fasttime" and time in Ticks and Tickspan
thomas.schatzl at oracle.com
Mon Sep 3 14:48:10 UTC 2018
On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 20:36 -0400, Kim Barrett wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 2018, at 8:03 AM, Thomas Schatzl <thomas.schatzl at oracle.
> > com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> So I think the FastUnorderedElapsedCounterSource and everything
> related to it should be removed. (I think this includes
> cpu/x86/rdtsc_x86.[ch]pp and UseFastUnorderedTimeStamps.)
> Removing a few milliseconds of sleeping during the initialization of
> this feature is a nice little startup benefit.
I agree with all that, but I would like to have an opinion from the
JFR team too about this before doing this.
The alternative I can see would be having GC specific Ticks/Tickspan
which I would like to avoid for obvious reasons.
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev