Proposal: Newer version-string scheme for the Java SE Platform and the JDK
scolebourne at joda.org
Thu Nov 2 22:10:56 UTC 2017
On 2 November 2017 at 21:21, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:
> In that environment, would you rather have a predictable
> lock-step rule for tool development, or would you still prefer
> your scheme, which optimizes for the infrequent "null" change,
> at the cost of guessing on a random variable?
If the JVM/bytecode level has not changed, I can't see any advantages
to anyone outside Oracle/OpenJDK of a version bump.
More information about the jdk-dev