New candidate JEP: 335: Deprecate the Nashorn JavaScript Engine

Simone Bordet simone.bordet at
Thu Jun 7 10:44:55 UTC 2018


On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at> wrote:
> There are several replies from people that are using Nashorn but one thing
> that is not clear from any of the mails so far is whether these usages are
> via the javax.script API or by code making direct usage of Nashorn APIs.

I use JSObject and ScriptObjectMirror from jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.

I will be willing to change those usages to the GraalJS equivalents if
it's going to be a long term solution (which I thought Nashorn was).

Simone Bordet
Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are,
to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability,
the implementation technique must be flawless.   Victoria Livschitz

More information about the jdk-dev mailing list