Ing. Oscar Bonilla, MBA obonilla66 at
Tue Jan 29 15:58:31 UTC 2019

What have special the packages  jdk.hotspot.agent,, and jdk.internal.vm.compiler, which are
the only source files that have GPL license but do not have the
expressly "Classpath Exception" designator in the file's header (all of the
source files have the GPL license)?

It is legal to use some classes of this 5 packages in a non-GPL system?
I am new here.  I am not know if this is the right mail list for this
question, but I have to ask it.

The JDK license said that the GPL license with classpath exception apply
only where Oracle has expressly included in the particular source file's
header the words "Oracle designates this particular file as subject to the
Classpath exception..."

I found a total of 17,873 source java files in openJDK 11.0.2, with this
11,683 files with GPL License with expressly "Classpath Exception"
1,643 files with AFS - Apache Software Fundation License
   157 files with BSD License
     1 file with MIT License
   341 resource files without any kind of copyright or License (where 334
are resource files)
4,048 files with GPL License without expressly "Classpath Exception"
designation in the source header. All in 5 specific directories:
   - \src\jdk.aot (107 files)
   - \src\jdk.hotspot.agent (998 files)
   - \src\ (181 files)
   - \src\ (4 files)
   - \src\jdk.internal.vm.compiler (2758 files)

But each of these 5 last directories has a "" file on its
corresponding root path:
whose header contains the expressly the "Classpath Exception" designation,
which makes it seem like the content of whole of each directory would be
included in the Exception, but none of their file included it.

Then my conclusion is 2 posibilities:
1. Oracle forgot to include the "Classpath Exception designation" in each
source files
2. There are some special circumstances that caused Oracle to consciously
exclude them from the "Classpath Exception"


More information about the jdk-dev mailing list