[patch] fix build on architectures with a signed size_t
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Mon Aug 4 07:55:41 PDT 2008
* Andrew Haley:
>> I was more concerned with the reality on s390, not what's in the
>> standard. Unfortunately, my first test case was wrong.
> Is the reality then that GNU C on s/390 is not ISO C compliant?
> I didn't know that. It must break a ton of code.
Let me repeat: My initial test case was wrong. It reported size_t as
signed, when it wasn't. Sorry about that.
At least on raptor.debian.org, in the sid chroot, size_t is unsigned.
More information about the jdk6-dev