Backporting changeset from 7 to 6 for bugfix
Andrew John Hughes
ahughes at redhat.com
Fri Jun 11 12:21:07 PDT 2010
On 11 June 2010 05:31, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
> Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> On 10 June 2010 02:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> Andrew Su wrote:
>>> changeset: 2208:0137b5857c63
>>> parent: 2183:90248595ec35
>>> user: okutsu
>>> date: Wed Mar 10 14:32:47 2010 +0900
>>> summary: 6932473: (tz) javazic produces incorrect SimpleTimeZone
>>> parameters with Sun<=7
>>> Do these look ok?
>> Yes; also approved to go back.
>> Since some Sun copyrighted files have leaked back in, we'll done another
>> pass to clean up any such files before b20 goes final.
> I think only a few more changes are needed to wrap up b20:
> * The various backports identified in the earlier message in this thread
> * Backport of 6957375 "java/net/ResponseCache getResponseCode and
> ResponseCacheTest fail after rebranding"
I see this come in while I was backporting; had to merge.
> * One more pass of the Sun -> Oracle copyright script
There are some new Zero bugfixes that could be backported for b20 (and
would allow us to drop the local copy in IcedTea6).
I've CCed Gary Benson who should be able to provide a list of bug IDs
Other than that, we should be good to go with b20.
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the jdk6-dev