Zero backport (2/7)
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Mon Mar 29 17:06:20 PDT 2010
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 29 March 2010 22:13, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> First of several fixes for Zero:
>>> changeset: 1078:8e7adf982378
>>> parent: 1073:de44705e6b33
>>> user: twisti
>>> date: Fri Nov 27 07:56:58 2009 -0800
>>> summary: 6896043: first round of zero fixes
>>> I believe this is a pile of fixes that accumulated for Zero in IcedTea
>>> prior to this commit:
>>> Amalgamation of cc-interp-backedge (Remove some duplicated code in
>>> cc-interp-jvmti (Disable some JVMTI capabilities which are unsupported
>>> or do not work with the C++ interpreter),
>>> ia64-bugfix (Remove workaround for IA64 GCC bug),
>>> s390-serialize (Correctly detect serialization segfaults on s390) and
>>> test-atomic-operations (Add check to see if GCC's sync_lock_test works).
>>> Ok to push? It builds ok here and passes the JTreg tests.
>> How does this relate to the JDK 7 version of the fix for this bug:
> It's the same, but without the change to globals_zero.hpp as it broke
> the build (presumably reliant on a hs17 change as it's not in the
> IcedTea-local version either).
I approve the current version going back, with a suggestion of making a
note of this merge difference for the future.
More information about the jdk6-dev