webrevs.2 for macosx changes to jdk7u-osx
paul.hohensee at oracle.com
Thu Dec 1 17:30:30 PST 2011
I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
On 12/1/11 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>> Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which
>>> is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure
>>> will be yet
>>> for the push into jdk7u-dev.
>> There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's
>> different from
>> the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for
>> approval first,
>> someone (i.e. either me or Edvard) needs to approve it, then the push
>> can happen
>> - regardless whether that's jdk7u-dev or jdk7u-osx.
> All the osx porting work is being discussed on the macosx-port-dev
> mailing list. Most core-libs subscribers will not be on that list
> (including me - which means my cc to that list will either bounce or
> get held up). There are proposed changes to core Java classes that
> should be explicitly reviewed and approved by the core-libs folk in my
More information about the jdk7u-dev