JDK 8 Warnings Cleanup Day -- Dec. 1st, 2011
philip.race at oracle.com
Tue Nov 29 11:48:58 PST 2011
Apologies .. I read your comment opposite to your meaning.
Yes, you are right. Less merges if AWT changes go to the AWT forest.
On 11/29/2011 11:45 AM, Phil Race wrote:
> I'd be surprised if there was any merge effort unless folks work on
> the same files.
> If client folks do client files and core folks don't then that would
> avoid it.
> And any merge effort would seem to me to be the same anyway, just
> where/when it occurs.
> Am I overlooking something ?
> On 11/29/2011 2:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 29/11/2011 02:10, Xiomara Jayasena wrote:
>>> 3. Pull this repo to base your changes on it:
>> The AWT/Swing folks might want to chime in here but I suspect they
>> may prefer to have fixes for the client area (java.awt.**,
>> javax.swing.** etc) to be based on jdk8/awt rather than the TL
>> forest. It's no big deal if they are pushed to jdk8/tl but it may
>> reduce the merge effort if the client area changes are pushed via the
>> jdk8/awt forest.
More information about the jdk8-dev