RFR(s) 8170873: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

Gustavo Romero gromero at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Dec 13 16:59:36 UTC 2016

On 13-12-2016 14:54, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>> I'll wait a review for PPC64. However I'm a little bit confused since the
>> webrev I provide will, when applied to 8u, add aarch64 as well which is not
>> currently in the 8u forest (maybe who pushes it could trim it off or use the
>> previous webrev)...
>> ... and maybe Andrew's reply (since he just added the aarch64-port-dev ML) was
>> just for aarch64-port folks and I got it wrong... (it seems the case...)
> I suppose it doesn't make much sense to include aarch64 in the non
> aarch64 8u. Thanks anyway!

Fair enough.

> FYI, the commit message for the backport shouldn't use the backport's
> bug id but the one from jdk 9 (8170153 in this case).

Thanks for pointing that out.


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list