jmx-dev [8] RFR(S): 8147857: RMIConnector logs attribute names incorrectly

Jaroslav Bachorik jaroslav.bachorik at
Mon Jan 25 08:41:24 UTC 2016

On 22.1.2016 17:49, Seán Coffey wrote:
> On 22/01/16 15:58, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> >Yes - please fix this issue in JDK 9 first as per rule 1:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >In a nutshell, produce a JDK 9 webrev, send it to
>>> >serviceability-dev at  for review and once reviewed, push
>>> >to jdk9/dev forest. Once done, you can then submit a JDK 8u integration
>>> >approval request.
>> I've applied Severin's patch to 9 and it applies as-is, once shuffled.
>> Are the existing reviews sufficient? Jaroslav, Daniel & I have all OKed
>> it already.
>> I do think the copyright notice should read 'Red Hat' and I've raised
>> this with Severin.
> I'm not sure. Everyone reviews and fixes in JDK 9 first and then
> backports where necessary. Since this was also reviewed on
> serviceability-dev, I think you might not need another round of reviews.

The changeset targeted by this fix was only in JDK 9 CPU until very 
recently. Therefore it was not really possible for an external 
contributor to develop a patch against JDK 9. JDK 8 CPU changes, on the 
other hand, have already been upsynced to JDK 8 Dev.


> regards,
> Sean.

More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list