[8u-dev] Request for approval: 8147857: RMIConnector logs attribute names incorrectly
sgehwolf at redhat.com
Mon Jan 25 09:43:12 UTC 2016
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 09:41 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> On 22.1.2016 17:49, Seán Coffey wrote:
> > On 22/01/16 15:58, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > > > Yes - please fix this issue in JDK 9 first as per rule 1:
> > > > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/groundrules.html
> > > > >
> > > > > In a nutshell, produce a JDK 9 webrev, send it to
> > > > > serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net for review and once reviewed, push
> > > > > to jdk9/dev forest. Once done, you can then submit a JDK 8u integration
> > > > > approval request.
> > > I've applied Severin's patch to 9 and it applies as-is, once shuffled.
> > > Are the existing reviews sufficient? Jaroslav, Daniel & I have all OKed
> > > it already.
> > >
> > > I do think the copyright notice should read 'Red Hat' and I've raised
> > > this with Severin.
> > I'm not sure. Everyone reviews and fixes in JDK 9 first and then
> > backports where necessary. Since this was also reviewed on
> > serviceability-dev, I think you might not need another round of reviews.
> The changeset targeted by this fix was only in JDK 9 CPU until very
> recently. Therefore it was not really possible for an external
> contributor to develop a patch against JDK 9. JDK 8 CPU changes, on the
> other hand, have already been upsynced to JDK 8 Dev.
Since this has been pushed to 9 now, OK to to go to JDK 8u as well? The
change is the same as for 9 after unshuffling.
Since I'd need a sponsor for pushing this, I'm attaching the hg-
exported changeset as well.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 13366 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the jdk8u-dev