Request for approval 8193807: avoid UnsatisfiedLinkError by providing empty basic implementations of getSystemCpuLoad and getProcessCpuLoad
christoph.langer at sap.com
Fri Dec 22 13:34:10 UTC 2017
I added the labels and also linked to 8079510. The colleagues wanted to keep it separate as it differs quite significantly to 8079510 due to the different JDK8 repo structure.
@Volker: please push it.
From: Seán Coffey [mailto:sean.coffey at oracle.com]
Sent: Freitag, 22. Dezember 2017 12:15
To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net; Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>
Subject: Re: Request for approval 8193807: avoid UnsatisfiedLinkError by providing empty basic implementations of getSystemCpuLoad and getProcessCpuLoad
* can you link this bug to JDK-8079510 ? I believe they're related.
* can you add a suitable noreg- label to the bug report
* can you add 9-na to the bug report. In some respect, this may have
been better done by backporting JDK-8079510 but I think your current
approach is ok also.
Approved for jdk8u-dev once the above is done.
On 22/12/17 10:39, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> please approve this fix for jdk8u:
> Change: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8193807/
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193807
> It has been reviewed in this thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-December/050694.html
> Thanks & Best regards
More information about the jdk8u-dev