Proposal for back-porting JFR to OpenJDK8u

Andrew Haley aph at
Tue Dec 11 09:59:01 UTC 2018

On 12/11/18 8:34 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:

> I think it would be good to have a staging repository for this
> purpose. For the PowerPC/AIX port we had a "porting" repository where
> we freely committed changes and fixed bugs (without JBS bug IDs and
> without the usual review process). After that, when we were confident
> that the port is in a good shape, we created a staging repository. For
> pushes into the staging repository, we cut the changes from the
> "porting" repo into handy pieces, we created JBS issues for them and
> reviewed them on the corresponding mailing lists (e.g. hostspot-dev,
> core-libs-dev, etc).

I see some advantages to doing that, but it'd be too much for us to do
to begin with. Let's concentrate for now on the smaller patches and
bug fixes that we have to do.

> Repositories have to belong to a project but I don't think it makes
> sense to create a new project just for the sake of downporting JFR.

Indeed not, no.

> If we want to get started right away

I don't, but we can certainly start thinking about it.

I know that substantial feature backports like JFR are exciting and
interesting, but that's not the main part of the job. Let's not get
too distracted by JFR from the practical business of making jdk8u work
well: we're in this for the long haul.

Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list