[8u-dev] RFA: 8206075: On x86, assert on unbound assembler Labels used as branch targets

Hohensee, Paul hohensee at amazon.com
Thu Dec 13 19:25:31 UTC 2018

It will be applied as a single changeset with multiple bugids. The webrev is the single changeset.

On 12/13/18, 7:44 AM, "Andrew Hughes" <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:45, Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
    > I pushed backports of 8206075, 8208480, and 8208647 to jdk11u. Combined request:
    > Please approve this small backport to jdk8u.
    > 8206075: On x86, assert on unbound assembler Labels used as branch targets
    > 8208480: Test failure: assert(is_bound() || is_unused()) after JDK-8206075 in C1
    > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206075 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206075
    > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075.8208480/webrev.00/
    > Review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-July/029136 http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-August/029627.html
    > The combined patch applies cleanly net of line number changes and file locations.
    > Thanks,
    > Paul
    Will this be applied as two separate changesets? This isn't clear from
    the posted webrev.
    Andrew :)
    Senior Free Java Software Engineer
    Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
    Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
    PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
    Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list