Proposal for back-porting JFR to OpenJDK8u
martijnverburg at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 14:44:56 UTC 2018
Hi San Hong,
Adopt can build the patch for you, but can we just check that the resulting
binaries are clean from a GPLv2+CE point of view?
That is, it might be safest from an IP flow standpoint to build this from a
forest with the code having been donated under the OCA or donated code
clearly being all licensed under GPLv2+CE.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 13:21, 李三红(三红) <sanhong.lsh at alibaba-inc.com> wrote:
> Thanks for comments, we are preparing our internal patches for webrev.
> In the meantime, Martijn/ Andrew mentioned we can use AdoptOpenJDK to
> produce technical preview build.
> Would like to know this... can Martijn point us some guide somewhere?
> 发件人: Andrew Haley [mailto:aph at redhat.com]
> 发送时间: 2018年12月13日 3:03
> 收件人: Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com>; 李三红(三红) <
> sanhong.lsh at alibaba-inc.com>
> 抄送: Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> 主题: Re: Proposal for back-porting JFR to OpenJDK8u
> On 12/12/18 1:44 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
> > I think the first thing to do would be to post the patch for review, a
> > shared repository would make the review process a bit more complex I
> > think, and only makes sense if there is a need to work further on the
> > patch collectively.
> Yes, exactly. That's the normal process, and it's the best place to start.
> Andrew Haley
> Java Platform Lead Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the jdk8u-dev