Proposal to revise forest graph and integration practices for JDK 9

Lana Steuck lana.steuck at
Mon Dec 2 16:52:57 PST 2013

On 12/02/2013 11:38 AM, mark.reinhold at wrote:
> That's no doubt a good thing, but are we confident that we'll be able 
> to do such an integration every week, including any necessary manual 
> testing of client code? If not then it seems we need a separate client 
> forest that feeds into the dev forest after appropriate testing, just 
> like the HotSpot forests. 
> - Mark 

It seems that it would depend on SQE resources. If SQE could perform 
manual client testing of the pre-integration build weekly, then we could 
do weekly integrations of jdk9-dev.

- Lana

More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list