Proposal to revise forest graph and integration practices for JDK 9

Yuri Nesterenko yuri.nesterenko at
Fri Dec 6 01:56:53 PST 2013

On 12/06/2013 01:45 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 12:47, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>> :
>> In fact, I think it may be even easier for SQE, here's a paradox.
>> We hope to have nightly builds established, and thus be prepared for PIT
>> very well; weekly routine is easier to plan in advance (and SQE is all
>> about planning); finally, we don't really do full-profile manual
>> testing  for PIT. It's all automated + some sanity checks +
>> cursory verification of actual fixes. This last task will be smaller
>> if do it weekly.
> I'm curious about the automated part. For the tests in the jdk
> repository then is it all of tests in the jdk_desktop group (see
> TEST.groups) or a subset of them?
> -Alan
There's rather elaborate division procedure for regression tests
(the tests in jdk repositories). I'll send you a link
to an internal wiki page about this if you wish.

Apart from these, we run separate functional suites; different
people own different parts of this. I personally run 2D functional
and do some sanity checks.


More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list