Initial forests for JDK 9
iris.clark at oracle.com
Thu Dec 12 12:20:39 PST 2013
>> Speaking of replies, should notifications set a reply-to header
>> directing replies to a discussion list? Having discussion on a
>> dedicated notification list would seem like a problem. (This applies
>> to all the per-forest notification lists, not just master.)
> Iris -- What's your plan for the Reply-To headers of changeset notifications?
Based on where the notifications for jdk8 go, these are the default "Reply-to" values for each of the new mailing lists:
jdk9-dev-changes: compiler-dev, core-libs-dev, serviceability-dev, net-dev, build-dev
jdk9-client-changes: 2d-dev, awt-dev, swing-dev
jdk9-hs-rt-changes: hotspot-runtime-dev, serviceability-dev
Does everything look right?
More information about the jdk9-dev