Initial forests for JDK 9

Daniel D. Daugherty daniel.daugherty at
Thu Dec 12 12:56:51 PST 2013

On 12/12/13 1:20 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
> Hi, Mark.
>>> Speaking of replies, should notifications set a reply-to header
>>> directing replies to a discussion list? Having discussion on a
>>> dedicated notification list would seem like a problem. (This applies
>>> to all the per-forest notification lists, not just master.)
>> Iris -- What's your plan for the Reply-To headers of changeset notifications?
> Based on where the notifications for jdk8 go, these are the default "Reply-to" values for each of the new mailing lists:
>    jdk9-changes: jdk9-dev
>    jdk9-dev-changes: compiler-dev, core-libs-dev, serviceability-dev, net-dev, build-dev
>    jdk9-client-changes: 2d-dev, awt-dev, swing-dev
>    jdk9-hs-changes: hotspot-dev
>    jdk9-hs-comp-changes: hotspot-compiler-dev
>    jdk9-hs-emb-changes: hotspot-runtime-dev

There should be an Embedded team alias in addition to hotspot-runtime-dev
for this one.Yes, Runtime wants to know about the Embedded team's work,
but I think the Embedded team would also like to know... :-)


>    jdk9-hs-gc-changes: hotspot-gc-dev
>    jdk9-hs-rt-changes: hotspot-runtime-dev, serviceability-dev
> Does everything look right?
> Thanks,
> iris

More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list