Initial forests for JDK 9

Mikael Auno mikael.auno at
Fri Dec 13 01:56:18 PST 2013

On 2013-12-12 20:13, mark.reinhold at wrote:
> 2013/12/12 2:12 -0800, stuart.marks at
>> I agree that everybody **should** be aware of changes to the master, but mixing
>> changeset notifications and discussion makes it more difficult for people to
>> control how they process mail. For example, I do a lot of filtering of OpenJDK
>> mail based on the mailing list to which it was delivered (using the Delivered-To
>> header). If notifications were mixed with discussion, I'd have to apply an
>> additional filter based on the subject line. This fails with replies to
>> changeset notices, for example.
> Filtering out changeset notifications is easy -- just look for the
> X-Hg-URL (or X-Hg-Changeset) header.

Unless you're using the fine system that is Beehive. Then filtering on 
arbitrary headers is unsupported.


More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list