Initial forests for JDK 9

Tim Bell tim.bell at
Fri Dec 13 10:27:42 PST 2013

On 12/13/13 10:17 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
> On 12/12/13 4:02 PM, mark.reinhold at wrote:
>> Okay.  How about we modify Iris's original proposal as follows:
>>    jdk9-changes        Changes to the JDK 9 master forest
>>    jdk9-all-changes    Changes to all JDK 9 forests (including master)
>> Change notifications for the master will only go to these two lists,
>> and specifically not to jdk9-dev.
>> To keep things simple, all of these lists will be opt-in.
> This looks great. I can't imagine why anybody would want 
> jdk9-all-changes, but that's why these lists are opt-in, right? If 
> somebody does find it useful, I have no objection.

Users may not want to look at it day-to-day, but I can see value in 
having a full set of messages in the archives.


More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list