Initial forests for JDK 9

mark.reinhold at mark.reinhold at
Sat Dec 14 13:51:34 PST 2013

2013/12/13 8:13 -0800, john.coomes at
> mark.reinhold at (mark.reinhold at wrote:
>> 2013/12/13 2:17 -0800, stuart.marks at
>> > This looks great. I can't imagine why anybody would want jdk9-all-changes, but 
>> > that's why these lists are opt-in, right?
>> I wondered that myself, and then noticed that the all-changes list for
>> JDK 8 has 87 subscribers ... and I'm one of them.
> I'm also subscribed, but with delivery disabled, just to avoid each
> push triggering a moderation event (including an "awaiting moderation"
> message back to me).  Pity the jdk9-all-changes moderator.

The sender filters on all the -changes lists have now been set up to
accept messages from all JDK 9 committers (and reviewers), so moderation
events should not be a problem.

- Mark

More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list