David M. Lloyd
david.lloyd at redhat.com
Thu Dec 15 08:09:53 PST 2011
On 12/15/2011 07:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 15/12/2011 13:08, David Bosschaert wrote:
>> I still strongly believe that the it's not right to define module
>> metadata in Java source files and have it end up in compiled .class
>> files inside jars. I thought that this decision was going to be made
>> by the modularity JSR so I am worried that the changes like this start
>> appearing in the VM and language design itself without having
>> consulted the JSR about it.
> I don't know if you've seen the requirements document (which I believe
> will be a starting point for the JSR) but it captures the divergent
> opinions on this topic:
This is really just a political dodge though. Without a JSR, this is
all still being shoved down our throats.
I'm worried that since outside opinion is being ignored, we're going to
end up with another java.util.logging - something developed in isolation
which nobody uses, because frankly, it sucks.
*Where is the JSR?*
More information about the jigsaw-dev