Implied readability + layers

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at
Thu Nov 5 14:02:47 UTC 2015

On 05/11/2015 13:17, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
> If API usage of com.baz in does not contain any type of 
> you wouldn't have any issue, otherwise must live on 
> layer1.

Are there types in com.baz's API? If not then users of com.baz 
need to vigorously lobby the maintainer of com.baz to stop using 
requires public. If com.baz agrees then will not read at 1 
and this frees up to use another version of in layer2.

On the other hand, if there are types in com.baz's API then will be exposed to at 1 types.


More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list