Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at
Sun Dec 11 14:21:41 UTC 2016

On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of module-info classfile format but did not get the last two changes,
> version of requires and the two new constant pool entries.
> Do you plan to push these changes in the jdk9 workspace soon so i will delay the release of ASM 6 alpha 2 or do you plan to introduce these changes later so i should release an alpha 2 now and release an alpha 3/beta later ?
That's right. We are going to aim for jdk-9+150 to get the latest 
proposals integrated.


More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list