Langer, Christoph christoph.langer at sap.com
Mon Feb 25 07:08:15 UTC 2019

Hi guys,

> I think the tags have a value - for most bundles most strings should
> be externalized, and getting a warning about it helps making sure
> that the strings are indeed externalized, especially for newcomers
> to the project. Having the NON-NLS tag shows that the developer made
> a conscious decision about not externalizing the string.
> For test bundles the strings should normally NOT be externalized,
> hence (were it not for other considerations) I think we should
> neither warn, nor need the macro. In other words, we would be
> disabling a signal that carries no information (noise).
> The other considerations in this case would be introducing project
> specific warning/error settings for test bundles, and perhaps
> confusing people about when to have and when to not have the tags.
> I think the two choices to consider are:
> * Keep using the NON-NLS tags in the test bundles
>   (few project specific overrides (any existing),
>    pointless tags in the test bundles)
> * Stop using the NON-NLS tags in the test bundles
>   (test project specific overrides,
>    no tags in the test bundles)
> I have no strong opinion either way either. The pros and cons are
> distributed pretty evenly for me, with maybe a slight anti-noise
> bias. Does anyone else have an opinion in the matter?

I'd accept the project specific settings for the tests. I think NON-NLS tags are needed in the actual plugin projects but in the tests they are annoying.

Disclaimer: It's an opinion from somebody who's just starting to do JMC development ��

Best regards

More information about the jmc-dev mailing list